While Valve’s Left 4 Dead has been a commercial hit, and well received by both critics and players alike, it can be criticised for its apparent lack of playtesting prior to release. The AAA title’s online play experience was initially poor and repetitive, as players would combine their overtly imbalanced melee attacks with poorly designed levels virtually every playthrough. Players could almost invariably gain indestructibility during many of the game’s ‘challenging’ crescendo events by backing into a closed off space. Regardless how many hordes the game sent at the players they were area able to indefinitely ‘right click’ to win.
Valve is typically praised for its balance and commitment to providing players with enjoyable and rewarding gameplay, and this blatant oversight clearly strayed from that vision. It’s expected that with Valve’s technology to detect where players were spending their time, and what actions they were performing, the issue could have been circumvented, yet this major issue was present in the release build, and not addressed in patches for several months. The cause of Left 4 Dead’s playtesting problem is likely that Valve’s playtesting environment conditioned playtesters to not coordinate blatant abuse of the system architecture. In the future, Valve should further encourage its playtesters to communicate strategies, abusive or otherwise, in a bid to ensure that playtesting is a genuine example of play.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment